ZH Classifieds
ZH Files
ZH Staff
WFTDA 12/1/2014 Rules
WFTDA 3/1/2014 Rules


Please Support Zebra Huddle!

Recent Posts

Re: Rule clarification by Bluebeard
January 17, 2020, 05:26:46 am

Rule clarification by 3Beers
December 28, 2019, 06:04:00 pm

Re: Resources for new referees. by Destructor
November 29, 2019, 01:13:40 pm

Resources for new referees. by Destructor
November 26, 2019, 06:01:48 pm

Jammer Passing Inactive Jammers by hellvis
November 14, 2019, 03:37:30 am

October 03, 2019, 12:54:03 pm

Clover Cup 2020 - March 20-22 - North Richland Hills, TX USA by SodOff
September 28, 2019, 10:09:13 am

September 22, 2019, 12:35:26 pm

Re: "Pincer" blocks = multipayer? by Bluebeard
July 11, 2019, 06:30:49 pm

"Pincer" blocks = multipayer? by Rego_Derby
July 11, 2019, 01:08:36 am

Recent Posts

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
Rules Discussion / Re: Rule clarification
« Last post by Bluebeard on January 17, 2020, 05:26:46 am »
I get into that "argument" around here also.  It boils down to "what is the impact that you are penalizing?"

If you are penalizing someone for forcing an opponent out of bounds, or down, during a no pack: that is a loss of position -> Out of play block (no gerunds here).  ;) 8)

If the impact you are penalizing is that the pack did not reform quickly enough and this player was not acting to reform the pack -> failure to reform.

Some people try to say that "the blocker was impeding the jammer, so it is a contact penalty" to make the case for out of play block.  Impeding is only a penalizable metric for illegal blocking zone penalties (forearms, leg blocks, head blocks). 
Rules Discussion / Rule clarification
« Last post by 3Beers on December 28, 2019, 06:04:00 pm »
In a "no pack" scenario, the front group is expected to disengage contact with the jammer, and return to the pack.
When the blockers fail to do so, I have been calling "Failure to Reform" penalties. My colleagues are insisting that it is "blocking out of play". Which, yes, is an appropriate penalty, if there is impact ( loss of position).
General Ref Discussion / Re: Resources for new referees.
« Last post by Destructor on November 29, 2019, 01:13:40 pm »
Sorry, i fixed link.
General Ref Discussion / Resources for new referees.
« Last post by Destructor on November 26, 2019, 06:01:48 pm »
Greetings, I wanted to consult with the referee community about a resource I wanted to make to guide the new officers. This is the positioning on the track to control the pack and offside actions. I have seen referees that, sometimes, where the action is (A jammer fought with two blocks, for example) we change the point of view and lose the focus of the pack or important areas to be controlled.

I have to fix some details, as in the first two images that the pack is poorly defined, it is an outline to see how it looks and what you think.

I would appreciate some feedback and I appreciate the time you spend. ^^
Rules Discussion / Jammer Passing Inactive Jammers
« Last post by hellvis on November 14, 2019, 03:37:30 am »
So let's say Jammer A passes Jammer B. Then Jammer B reaches over Jammer A and passes the star to pivot who puts it on. Jammer A then passes the new jammer. How is this scored? Jammer A didn't get the point of the initial pass of Jammer because lap points are done away with. And then the Jammer A doesn't get the point on the pivot turned Jammer and then a full pass would only count as three points?
Rules Discussion / Re: JAMMER HELMET COVER
« Last post by Stray Taco on October 03, 2019, 12:54:03 pm »
No. If the Jammer starts the jam in the penalty box and dons the cover prior to making all the passes they need to earn Lead Jammer, they should be awarded lead.

I'm basing this on Scenario C2.2.2.A:
Red Jammer starts the Jam with their helmet cover inside-out. The stars are not visible with high contrast. They remove the cover, invert it, and put it back on their helmet. They then legally pass all Skaters, including the foremost Blocker.

Outcome: Red Jammer is declared Lead.

Rationale: Since Red Jammer did not have the ability to gain Lead prior to removing the Star from their head, they did not lose that ability.

Keep in Mind: If Red Jammer had removed the Star when the stars were visible, they would have lost the ability to gain Lead.

This scenario is similar: since they didn't have the ability to gain Lead until they were out of the Penalty Box AND wearing the cover with the Star visible, they didn't lose that ability, so they're still eligible to gain the ability and then earn Lead.
Events / Clover Cup 2020 - March 20-22 - North Richland Hills, TX USA
« Last post by SodOff on September 28, 2019, 10:09:13 am »
The official’s application for Clover Cup 2020 is now open! Follow this link to apply:

Hosted by the Dallas Derby Devils, Clover Cup will be 3 full days (March 20-22, 2020) at the NYTEX Sports Centre in North Richland Hills, Texas.

This year's tournament will be bigger and more exciting than ever!  We plan to have TWO TRACKS, featuring WFTDA, MRDA, and JRDA games. We will also have multiple formats such as bracketed and round-robin games.

Clover Cup was a WFTDA Recognized Tournament in 2019 and we will be applying for Recognized status in 2020. This is a great tournament to prepare for applying for post-season play!

Tournament Head Referee(s):
  • Dr Math
  • Shanksy
Tournament Head NSO(s):
  • Matante
  • Sod Off
  • Rabid Derby Fan
  • Queen Loseyateefa
  • Ice Queen

The application deadline for priority consideration (including crew head positions) is November 15. While we will accept applications until December 20th, applications received on or before November 15th will have priority. 

Please join us for Clover Cup 2020!
Rules Discussion / JAMMER HELMET COVER
« Last post by 3Beers on September 22, 2019, 12:35:26 pm »
Rules state: "...Jammer must pass the foremost in-play blocker legally, in bounds, and upright, while wearing the Jammer cover with the stars visible...."
If starting the jam in the penalty box, does the player have to be wearing the helmet cover?
Rules Discussion / Re: "Pincer" blocks = multipayer?
« Last post by Bluebeard on July 11, 2019, 06:30:49 pm »
That is correct.  A multiplayer block penalty requires two teammates to have a link or grasp between them and an opponent to attempt to pass between those two players and be impeded.  The opponent does not need to directly challenge the link,or grasp, itself. 

From OP it is not completely clear if there is link or grasp going on.  If there is, issue the penalty.  If there is not a link or grasp going on, there is not a multiplayer block penalty to issue.
Rules Discussion / "Pincer" blocks = multipayer?
« Last post by Rego_Derby on July 11, 2019, 01:08:36 am »
Two White blockers are facing each other in the middle of the track and the arms pointing in the counterclockwise direction are bracing each other's shoulders. The blockers have formed a triangle with their braced arms away from any incoming skater and their bodies making up the other two sides creating a kind of pincer or something that resembles a binder clip. A jammer skates in and challenges the seam made by their shoulders facing the clockwise direction. I had one ref suggest this constitutes a multiplayer despite the fact that the brace or link itself isn't being challenged because without the brace/link the jammer should be able to more easily shove one of the skaters out of the way to create a gap. Is this correct?
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10

Featured Product


Zebra Huddle Head Referee Bout Booklet


Featured Classifieds

ZH Files

How to Score a Point in Roller Derby
Rating: *****
Downloads: 4066
Views: 6742
Filesize: 327.61KB
Date: January 17, 2017, 04:21:03 am
Comments (0)
By: AdamSmasher
June 2013 Ruleset situational questions
Rating: *****
Downloads: 2647
Views: 5479
Filesize: 29.71KB
Date: February 07, 2014, 04:57:32 pm
Comments (2)
By: Crash Test Ref
Rules Q&A and Publications for 6/15/13 Document
Rating: (None)
Downloads: 2842
Views: 6153
Filesize: 26.27KB
Date: August 02, 2013, 04:10:40 pm
Comments (0)
By: Shaun Ketterman
Rules Q&A and Publications for 1/1/13 Document (4/24/13 Updates)
Rating: *****
Downloads: 3678
Views: 6116
Filesize: 28.07KB
Date: April 25, 2013, 05:45:34 pm
Comments (0)
By: Shaun Ketterman

Powered by EzPortal